Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.2d 445 - La Porte v. Bitker

La Porte v. Bitker’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.2d 445 · 1944

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2003

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

201944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 201 (American Samoa Labor Standards Amendments of 1956)

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. · Tumey v. State of Ohio · Morgan v. United States · Morgan v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a presumption of regularity ... must be accorded the acts of a government official”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.