Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.2d 708 - Rookard v. Huff

Rookard v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.2d 708 · 1944

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
December 1957
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Waley v. Johnston · Salinger v. Loisel · Craemer v. State of Washington · Ex parte Rosier · Andersen v. Treat

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`Though the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to habeas corpus proceedings, the fact that the same issues have been decided in a former proceeding may, and sometimes should, as a matter of judicial discretion, be given controlling weight. * * *'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.