Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.2d 920 - Tiger v. Sellers

Tiger v. Sellers’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.2d 920 · 1944

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1990

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

20194419501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 25 U.S.C. § 393A

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Brewster v. Gage · Hecht v. Malley · United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co. · United States v. Noble

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In an action against one upon contract, he may offset or plead as a defense thereto any claim arising to him by virtue of any contract with the one instituting the suit.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.