Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.2d 926 - Palmer v. Miller

Palmer v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.2d 926 · 1944

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
2
states following
November 1987
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently November 1987 · most notably Finnegan v. United States (1953), Coca Cola Bottling Co. of Black Hills v. Hubbard (1953)

48 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

30019441950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Palmer v. Hoffman · Gunning v. Cooley · London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Woelfle · Hall v. Ætna Life Ins. · Ayers v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * No party may assign as error any portion of the charge or omission therefrom unless he objects thereto before the jury retires to consider its verdict, stating distinct ly the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * In fairness to the trial court and to the parties, objections to a charge must be sufficiently specific to bring into focus the precise nature of the alleged error. Where a party might have obtained the correct charge by specifically calling the attention of the trial court to the error and where part of the charge was correct, he may not through a general exception obtain a new trial. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““ * * * the burden of proof was upon the plaintiff, and we know of no federal rule which limits the number of times that that truth, or any other truth, may be restated by a federal judge in a charge which on the whole is accurate and fair.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.