Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.3d 234 - Barber v. Johnson

Barber v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.3d 234 · 1998

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
August 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2017

11 federal appellate ·

110199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Lindh v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we may not ignore the [Hogue ] decision, for in this circuit one panel may not overrule the decision of a prior panel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.