Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.3d 511 - Beggs v. Rossi

Beggs v. Rossi’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.3d 511 · 1998

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Tito Pollice v. National Tax Funding Lp (2000), Hamilton v. United Healthcare of Louisiana, Inc. (2002)

9 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

120199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Staub v. Harris · Newman v. Boehm, Pearlstein & Bright, Ltd. · Beggs v. Rossi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any obligation or alleged obligation of a consumer to pay money arising out of a transaction in which the money, property, insurance, or services which are the subject of the transaction are primarily for personal, family, or household purposes, whether or not such obligation has been reduced to judgment.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the tax is not levied upon the purchase or registration of the vehicle per se, but rather upon the ownership of the vehicle by the citizen”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]here is simply no `transaction' . . . of the kind contemplated by the statute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.