Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 F.3d 673 - Vega v. National Life Insurance Services, Inc.

Vega v. National Life Insurance Services, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

145 F.3d 673 · 1998

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Firestone Tire and Rubber Company v. Bruch · Pilot Life Insurance v. Dedeaux · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendon · Fmc Corporation v. Holliday

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable, good faith investigation of the claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]ny plan, fund, or program which was heretofore or is hereafter established or maintained by an employer ... to the extent that such plan, fund, or program was established or is maintained for the purpose of providing for its participants or their beneficiaries, through the purchase of insurance or otherwise, (A) medical, surgical, or hospital care or benefits, or benefits in the event of sickness, accident, disability, death or unemployment....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) An individual and his or her spouse shall not be deemed to be employees with respect to a trade or business, whether incorporated or unincorporated, which is wholly owned by the individual or by the individual and his or her spouse, and (2) A partner in a partnership and his or her spouse shall not be deemed to be employees with respect to the partnership.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.