Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 F. App'x 492

United States v. Johnson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 5, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-10-05

Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Pineiro

Decided 2005-10-05

PER CURIAM: *

¶1 Shawn Joshua Johnson appeals the 63-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for violating the Federal Gun Control Act. He renews his argument, preserved in the district court, that his constitutional rights were violated when the district court assessed a two-level enhancement, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 (obstruction of justice), based on judicially determined facts, citing Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).

¶2 Pursuant to the recent decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 756, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), for sentencing errors preserved in the district court, “we will ordinarily vacate the sentence and remand,” unless the error is harmless. United States v. Pineiro, 410 F.3d 282, 284 (5th Cir.2005). The two-level enhancement here violated Johnson’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by jury. See Booker, 125 S.Ct. at 756. Given the district court’s statements at sentencing, the Government cannot carry its burden of demonstrating beyond a reasonable doubt “that the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent the error.” Pineiro, 410 F.3d at 286.

¶3 Johnson’s sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded for resentencing. See Pineiro, 410 F.3d at 284.

¶4 SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

*

¶5 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

/145/fappx/492 · .json · Public domain