Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 FAPPX 809 - United States v. Burrell

United States v. Burrell’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
April 2015
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002)

Relies on United States v. Booker · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Cheek

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree with the district court that a conviction of ‘forcibly assaulting], resisting], opposing], impeding], intimidating], or interfering] with [a federal officer],' under § 111(a)(1), ‘has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.