Sunenblick v. Harrell’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on Lanza v. Drexel & Co. · Katsaros v. Cody · Noonan v. Cunard Steamship Co. · Response of Carolina, Inc., Florida Computer Response, Inc., Datatron Corporation, Response of Colorado, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc., Leasco Response, Inc. v. John Wright · Rosen v. Dick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The parties plaintiff seeks to add are all related to the parties already named in this action and, indeed, have been participating in discovery. This mere addition of parties does not change the underlying claims or the nature of the relief desired and, therefore, does not revive plaintiffs right to a jury trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.