Anschell v. Sackheim’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
5 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 1996
5 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co. · Travelers Health Ass'n v. Commonwealth of Virginia State Corporation Commission · Norwood v. Kirkpatrick · Collett Kitpatrick v. Texas and Pacific Railway Co
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.