Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 FSUPP2D 101 - Van Ormer v. Aspen Technology, Inc.

Van Ormer v. Aspen Technology, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
October 2009
most recently cited

8 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21e of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on Lawrence Greebel Richard Crane Brian Robinson John Ann Somers v. Ftp Software Inc · Serabian v. Amoskeag Bank Shares, Inc. · 970 F. Supp. 746 - In Re Silicon Graphics, Inc. Securities Litigation · Suna v. Bailey Corp. · 27 F. Supp. 2d 268 - Lirette v. Shiva Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) specify the time, place, and content of each allegedly misleading statement or omission, (2) explain and provide factual support for why the statement is fraudulent, (3) provide specific factual allegations to support a reasonable inference that adverse circumstances existed at the time of the statements and were known and deliberately or recklessly disregarded by defendants, and (4) set forth the source of the information and reasons for the belief when allegations are made on information and belief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Allegations supported only by unidentified 'sales managers' who got their information from unspecified sources fall woefully short of meeting particularity requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.