Corbin v. Chitwood’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 534 (National Law) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Paul v. Davis · Rochin v. People of California · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press · Kansas v. Hendricks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“crimes against children/lewd or lascivious,””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Haskell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.