United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 228 (Child Support Recovery Act of 1992) · 18 U.S.C. § 3612 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on United States v. Cotton · Weaver v. Graham · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · California Department of Corrections v. Morales · Toussie v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the offense is committed and the limitations period begins to run once all elements of the offense are established, regardless of whether the defendant continues to engage in criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“embezzlement under 18 U.S.C. § 656 is not a continuing offense”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.