Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 HAW 56 - State v. Brown.

State v. Brown.’s Empirical Analysis

2019

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Davis v. Alaska · 1 Haw. App. 625 - State v. Liuafi · State v. Balisbisana · State v. Acker.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “consider[ ] a number of factors in determining whether an error is harmless in this context, including 'the importance of the witness' testimony in the prosecution's case, whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of evidence corroborating or contradicting the testimony of the witness on material points, the extent of cross-examination otherwise permitted, and, of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[e]xclusion of the criminal charges against [the complaining witness] and the fact that [she] was on probation deprived the jury of evidence that she had an interest to shape her testimony against [the defendant] to avoid punishment and to prevent the possible revocation of her probation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[T]he main and essential purpose of confrontation is to secure for the opponent the opportunity of cross-examination, . . . and the exposure of a witness' motivation in testifying is a proper and important function of the constitutionally protected right of cross examination.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.