Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 IDAHO 554 - State v. Rice

State v. Rice’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Oliver · Cooke v. United States · Savin · Camp v. East Fork Ditch Co., Ltd. · Ross v. Coleman Co., Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon the answer and evidence taken, the court or judge must determine whether the person proceeded against is guilty of the contempt charged, and if it be adjudged that he is guilty of the contempt, a fine may be imposed on him not exceeding five thousand dollars ($5,000), or he may be imprisoned not exceeding five (5) days, or both____Additionally, the court in its discretion, may award attorney’s fees and costs to the prevailing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.