Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Idaho 586 - State v. Lippert

State v. Lippert’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 2021

8 state decisions

60200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Clayton · State v. Peck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon being made aware of a defendant's request for substitute counsel, the trial court must afford the defendant a full and fair opportunity to present the facts and reasons in support of a motion for substitution of counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.