Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Idaho 75 - State v. Joslin

State v. Joslin’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
December 2023
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2023

12 state decisions

80200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Craig v. Boren · Smith v. Doe · United States v. Virginia · Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan · Clark v. Jeter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Therefore, [the registration requirement of SORA] cannot constitute the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment under our State Constitution. Since it is not punishment under Idaho law, it would not constitute the infliction of punishment under the Constitution of the United States. See , Smith v. Doe , 538 U.S. 84 [ 123 S.Ct. 1140 ] (2003).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “provides an essential regulatory purpose that assists law enforcement and parents in protecting children and communities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.