145 Ind. App. 52 - Holmes v. Holmes’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““1) The Court failed to grant Appellant’s Change of Venue from the Judge. “2) The Court erred in granting Appellee’s OBJECTIONS TO THE JURISDICTION OF AND PETITION TO STRIKE AND EXPUNGE FROM THE RECORDS, ENTRIES MADE BY FORMER JUDGE PRO TEM, of July 3, 1969. “3) The Court erred in granting Appellee’s MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT’S PETITION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT, of October 23, 1969, and refusing to allow Appellant’s testimony, to issue of alimony and Court Orders entered at the time of the divorce, even though Appellant remarried. “4) The Court erred in refusing to hear evidence of Appellant relating questions of alimony and Court Orders regarding Appellant’s Petition of November 26, 1969, after Appellant remarried. “5) The Court erred in granting Appellee’s PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT’S PETITION, of December 10, 1969, and refusing to allow Appellant’s testimony relating to issue of alimony and Court Orders entered at the time of divorce, even though Appellant remarried. “6) The Court erred in refusing to allow Appellant to testify regarding issue of alimony and Court Orders entered at the time of the divorce. “1) That the decision of the Court is contrary to law.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 148 Ind. App. 409 - Carlson v. Carlson