State v. Hillis’s Empirical Analysis
1937
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2016
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Foster · State v. Buis · State v. Goodrich · State v. Curtis · State v. Seely
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * la: to take and carry away feloniously and usu. observed: take or appropriate without right or leave and with intent to keep or make use of wrongfully . . . (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The indictment or information must contain, . . . second, a statement of the facts constituting the offense, in plain and concise language, without repetition.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hazen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.