Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 KAN 792 - State v. Watson

State v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2008

16 state decisions

6019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. White · State v. Bowman · In re Clyne · State v. Wingett · State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Concealment is any statement or conduct which prevents another from acquiring knowledge of a fact. ... To constitute concealment it must appear that the statements or conduct of the accused was calculated and designed to prevent discovery of the crime with which he is charged; mere silence, inaction or nondisclosure is not enough.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[c]oncealment is any statement or conduct which prevents another from acquiring knowledge of a fact. Nondisclosure is a failure to reveal facts, and may exist when there is no concealment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.