Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Md. 128 - Archer v. State

Archer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
5
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

2 district · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently September 2008 · most notably Simmons v. State (1933), Mason v. State (1985)

2 district · 70 state decisions

140192419301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boyd v. United States · Hyde v. United States · United States v. Kissel · Johnson v. United States · Brown v. C. T. Elliott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We are clearly of the opinion that section 11 of article 57 means now just what it meant before the passage of the Acts of 1916 and 1918, and that the prosecution of persons charged with conspiracies or other misdemeanors not ‘placed along with felonies’ by the grades of punishment fixed for them by the common law or by statute, must be begun within one year from the date of the conspiracy.” 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Common law misdemeanors are not ‘punished by confinement in the penitentiary’ in the sense of the above section . ...” Id. at 136 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a conspiracy to defraud the general public or a particular class is sufficient,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.