Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Md. 385 - Boyd v. Johnson

Boyd v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 1999

19 state decisions

8019241930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cameron v. Boeger · Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Semmes · Courtney v. State · Boogren v. St. Paul City Railway Co. · Rowe v. Fogle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Court below ruled that the plaintiffs were entitled to a reasonable compensation for the work and labor actually done by them; but that they were not entitled to the contingent compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.