Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

145 Misc. 477

Lind v. Miller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1932-11-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently November 1938

3 state decisions

Relies on Surace v. Danna

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1932-11-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1An allowance made to an incompetent World War veteran is exempt from levy and sale by virtue of an execution, and from seizure in any legal proceeding. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 667.) Obviously, this would be so if the pension has been received by the veteran, his committee or guardian; otherwise such an exemption can produce no beneficial effect. (Benedict v. Higgins, 165 App. Div. 611; Surace v. Danna, 248 N. Y. 18.)

¶2Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

¶3All concur; present, Lydon, Levy and Callahan, JJ.

/145/misc/477 · .json · Public domain