Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Miss. 116 - Fisher v. State

Fisher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
October 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 85 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2014 · most notably Henry v. State of Mississippi (1965), Brown v. State of Mississippi (1936)

3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions

1701926193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. State · Jones v. State · Tulane University v. Board of Assessors · Hampton v. State · White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Coercing the supposed state's criminals into confessions and using such confessions so coerced from them against them in trials has been the curse of all countries. It was the chief inequity, the crowning infamy of the Star Chamber, and the Inquisition, and other similar institutions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In passing upon an application for a change of venue the court looks to a completed trial, and if at any stage of the trial it appears that the case has been so prejudged, or that other conditions exist which prevent a defendant from securing a fair and impartial trial, the court should entertain the motion even though this appear upon a motion for a new trial. The object of the law is to give a person a fair and impartial trial, and if this result is obtained the court will not disturb its action. But if the court is satisfied clearly that it has not been obtained, it will reverse itself, set aside the judgment, and grant the motion. ( 145 Miss. at 129 , 110 So. at 363 )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Perhaps no precise definition can be given it [a fair trial], but it certainly must be one where the accused’s legal rights are safeguarded and respected. There must not only be a fair and impartial jury and a learned and upright judge to instruct the jury and pass upon the legal questions, but there ought to be an atmosphere of calm, in which the witnesses can deliver their testimony without fear and intimidation, and in which the attorneys can assert the defendant’s rights freely and fully, and in which the truth may be received and given without fear of violence. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.