145 Mo. App. 78
Decided June 6, 1910
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 1910-06-06
■Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Chas. Claflin Allen, Judge. (1) Plaintiffs sue on an alleged joint contract, and such allegation will not support the verdict herein against one of the defendants on his alleged individual undertaking. Davis v. Creamery Assn., 63 Mo. App. 477; Waldhier v. Eailroad, 71 Mo. 514; Faulkner v. Faulkner, 73 Mo. 327; Bagnell Timber Co. v. Eailway, 180 Mo. 420; Van Hoosier v. Dunlap, 117 Mo. App. 529; Meyers v. Eailroad, 120 Mo.
Relies on Meyers v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed (and certified to Supreme Court) · Decided 1910-06-06
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently May 1962
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1ON MOTION FOR REHEARING (July 19, 1910).
¶2The motion for rehearing is overruled. As the opinion heretofore filed in this .case is in conflict Avith the opinion in the case of Meyers v. M., K & T. Ry. Co., 120 Mo. App. 288, 96 S. W. 737, decided by the Kansas City Court of Appeals, this cause is certified to the Supreme Court for its decision.