Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 N.C. App. 111 - Williams v. McCoy

145 N.C. App. 111 - Williams v. McCoy’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 104 N.C. App. 498 - State v. Wallace · State v. Tate · 125 N.C. App. 96 - Warren v. Jackson · 130 N.C. App. 263 - State v. McDonald · 135 N.C. App. 125 - Blackmon v. Bumgardner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Elvidence concerning when a litigant seeks legal counsel can, in some instances, be admissible.... [Inquiry concerning when plaintiff hired an attorney is admissible to impeach a litigious plaintiff and is relevant to rebut the existence and extent of plaintiff's injuries from the accident, if evidence exists to support the inquiry on either basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible upon the issue whether he acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. This rule does not require the exclusion of evidence of insurance against liability when offered for another purpose, such as proof of agency, ownership, or control, or bias or prejudice of a witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the attorney-client privilege is not violated when an attorney questions the plaintiff concerning whether she had communications with an attorney on a particular date, as long as such questioning does not probe the substance of the client's conversation with her attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.