Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 N.C. App. 440 - State v. Hilbert

145 N.C. App. 440 - State v. Hilbert’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dollar v. United States · State v. Cummings · State v. Hines · 127 N.C. App. 536 - State v. Deese · 135 N.C. App. 734 - State v. Linemann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prior to imposing a sentence other than the presumptive term for a particular offense, the trial court is required to consider the statutory list of aggravating and mitigating sentencing factors listed in N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.16 [], to make written findings of fact concerning the factors, and to determine whether one set outweighs the other or whether they are counterbalanced.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[The d]efendant lastly contends that the trial court abused its discretion by finding certain mitigating factors in one judgment but failing to do so in the other judgments. However, a party must present to the trial court a timely request, objection or motion in order to preserve a question for appellate review. N.C. R. App. P. 10 [ (a) ](1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.