145 N.C. App. 478 - Vadala v. Vadala’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
25 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 140 N.C. App. 369 - Barrett v. Barrett · 76 N.C. App. 545 - Talent v. Talent · 138 N.C. App. 467 - Rhew v. Rhew · 81 N.C. App. 125 - Skamarak v. Skamarak · 131 N.C. App. 784 - Glass v. Glass
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the court must determine whether [that] spouse would be unable to maintain his or her accustomed standard of living, established prior to separation, without financial contribution from the other.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“make a specific finding of fact on each of the factors in subsection (b) of this section if evidence is offered on that factor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'[W]hen the court fails to find facts so that this Court can determine that the order is adequately supported by competent evidence ... then the order entered thereon must be vacated and the case remanded for detailed findings of fact.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sergeef v. Sergeef
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.