Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 NEB 306 - Hawk v. Olson

Hawk v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1944

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2000 · most notably Darr v. Burford (1950), Hawk v. Olson (1945)

2 federal appellate · 6 district · 19 state decisions

1701944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ponzi v. Fessenden · Rigor v. State · Thomas v. . People · Kelley v. State of Oregon · Michaelson v. Beemer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The writ of error coram nobis has been recognized in this state. Carlsen v. State, supra” (i. e. 129 Neb. 84 , 261 N.W. 339 ). “The object of the writ is to bring into the record, before the court that rendered the judgment, facts which were unknown to the defendant at the time of trial through no lack of reasonable diligence on his part, which, if known at the time of the trial, would have resulted in a different judgment. As stated in Carlsen v. State, supra * * *: ‘ * * * the writ of habeas corpus does not afford a corrective judicial process to remedy an error of fact, at the trial, without which a conviction would not have resulted. * * * Habeas corpus is not a proper remedy to release one from prison who has been wrongfully convicted.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.