Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 NH 41 - State v. Howe

State v. Howe’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mempa v. Rhay · Foss v. Foss · State v. Smart · Stone v. Shea · State v. Monroe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court in its discretion may permit either party to take the deposition of any witness, except the defendant, in any criminal case upon a finding by a preponderance of the evidence that such deposition is necessary: (1) To preserve the testimony of any witness who is unlikely to be available for trial due to illness, absence from the jurisdiction, or reluctance to cooperate; or (2) To ensure a fair trial, avoid surprise, or for other good cause shown. In determining the necessity, the court shall consider the complexity of the issues involved, other opportunities or information available to discover the information sought by the deposition, and any other special or exceptional circumstances that may exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Under RSA 517:13, the burden is on the defendant requesting a deposition to establish necessity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.