Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 N.M. 22 - MALISSA C. v. Matthew Wayne H.

MALISSA C. v. Matthew Wayne H.’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A

Relies on Welch-Doden v. Roberts · Rhinehart v. Nowlin · Sareen v. Sareen · Escobar v. Reisinger · Barnae v. Barnae

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “jurisdiction substantially in conformity”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. NB v. GA

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.