Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 N.M. 242 - State v. Maddox

State v. Maddox’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. Garza (2009), State v. Gallegos (2009)

67 state decisions

510200820102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Smith v. Hooey · Dickey v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prejudice . . . should be assessed in the light of the interests of [the] defendants which the speedy trial right was designed to protect. This Court has identified three such interests: (i) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (ii) to minimize anxiety and concern of the accused; and (iii) to limit the possibility that the defense will be impaired.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[b]ecause the [s]tate has the burden of bringing a case to trial, we . . . weigh unreasonable periods of delay against the [s]tate. The [s]tate must affirmatively seek to move the case to trial, even while plea negotiations are pending.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) the length of delay, (2) the reasons for the delay, (3) the defendant's assertion of his right, and (4) the actual prejudice to the defendant. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.