Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 N.M. 68 - State v. Sosa

State v. Sosa’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Defense counsel] says, No evidence of date rape drug. That is wrong. The Judge wouldn’t allow things — wouldn’t allow you to hear things that you are not allowed to consider as evidence. That wouldn’t come in. That’s why you get instructed. So when [J.M.] sat there from this bench, from this witness stand and said, I felt like I had never felt before. I felt drugged. That is testimony. You are allowed to consider that. When Dr. Williams came in and said that all of her statements were consistent with being drugged, you’re allowed to consider that.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.