State v. Vance’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Swafford v. State · State v. Johnson · State v. Franco · State v. Saiz · In Re Gabriel M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We therefore first review the elements of the charged offenses and then consider whether the [s]tate presented sufficient facts at trial in order to support the elements of both crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gwynne“[t]he proper analytical framework is whether the facts presented at trial establish that the jury reasonably could have inferred independent factual bases for the charged offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gwynne“consider such factors as proximity in time and space, similarities, the sequencing of the acts, intervening events, and the defendant's goals for and mental state during each act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gwynne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.