Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 N.M. 719 - State v. Dylan J.

State v. Dylan J.’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

47 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Garcia (2009), State v. Montoya (2015)

47 state decisions

340200920102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Olano · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Bernal · State v. Lucero

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n determining whether there has been plain error, we must examine the alleged errors in the context of the testimony as a whole.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “indulge a strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[M]ere evidentiary prejudice is not enough. Counsel's deficient performance must represent so serious a failure of the adversarial process that it undermines judicial confidence in the accuracy and reliability of the outcome.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.