State v. Dietrich’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
September 2020
most recently cited
4 district · 29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Aguilar v. Texas · Spinelli v. United States · Stirone v. United States · Bell Warden v. Cone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“consider two paramount factors in deciding whether the district court abused its discretion in admitting [ Rule 11-404(B) ] evidence: whether the [s]tate made a sufficient showing that the evidence would serve a legitimate purpose other than to show character ... and whether the probative value was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice or other factors”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Gwynne“named informant has greater incentive to provide truthful information . . . than an unnamed or anonymous individual”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Vest
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.