State v. Casillas’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2023
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duren v. Missouri · State v. Rojo · State v. Varela · State v. Allen · State v. Hodge
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o show a prima facie violation of the fair cross-section requirement, a defendant must demonstrate that (1) the group alleged to be excluded is a ‘distinctive’ group in the community, (2) the group’s representation in venires from which juries are selected is not fair and reasonable in relation to the number of such persons in the community, and (3) this under-representation results from the systematic exclusion of the group in the jury-selection process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Flores“Questions concerning embezzlement, burglary, auto theft and larceny involve dishonesty, [a]re probative as to truthfulness and [a]re proper [for] cross-examination under Evidence Rule 608(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres“A party may ... inquire into particular instances of a witness's conduct on cross-examination ... providing the conduct is probative of truthfulness or untruthfulness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Torres
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.