Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 NW2D 514 - Schrank v. Meade

Schrank v. Meade’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2020

5 state decisions

201966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re Kaspari's Estate · Shong v. Farmers' & Merchants' State Bank, Inc. · Van Sickle v. Olsen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ “There must be an intention on the part of the donor to relinquish the right of dominion on one hand and to create it on the other, and the delivery must be not only of possession but also of the dominion and control of the property. To have the effect of a valid gift, therefore, the transfer of possession and title must be absolute and go into immediate effect, so far as the donor can make it so by intent and delivery, and must be so complete that if he again resumes control over it without consent of the donee he becomes liable as a trespasser.” ' ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Implied trust — How created. An implied trust arises in the following cases: * * * * * * 4. When a transfer of real property is made to one person and the consideration therefor is paid by or for another, a trust is presumed to result in favor of the person by or for whom such payment is made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.