Murdock v. . Waterman’s Empirical Analysis
1895
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 2002 · most notably John W. Masury & Son v. Bisbee Lumber Co. (1937), Clute v. . Clute (1910)
45 state decisions — followed in 13 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hughes v. Edwards · McMullen v. . Rafferty · Winchell v. . Hicks · Harper v. . Fairley · Hauselt v. . Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The guiding and controlling consideration is that the payment must be made by a party to the obligation, or by his authorized agent. If payment by one is relied upon to take the contract out of the statute as to another, it must be shown that the party who made the payment was in fact or in law the agent of the other in respect to his liability. When the person paying is bound, those in privity with him may be bound, also.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is obvious that a payment by a stranger, or by a person not authorized to represent the debtor, affords no ground for assuming any admission on his part, or for inferring a new promise by him to pay the balance of the debt, and a payment not made by him or by his authority cannot, therefore, arrest the running of the statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Viets v. Marks““Part payment of a debt by a debtor constitutes an admission, by the' person obligated to pay, of his liability for the whole debt upon which the partial payment is made, and justifies an inference of a new promise made, at that time, to pay the portion remaining unpaid.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burdick v. Hicks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.