¶1 Agree to affirm on opinion by O’Brien, J., on original argument (143 N. Y. 271).
¶2 All concur, except Andrews, Ch. J., and Peckham, J., dissenting.
¶3 Judgment affirmed.
145 N.Y. 601
40 N.E 164
Lough v. . Outerbridge
Decided October 9, 1894
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1894-10-09
<p>Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made April 14, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.</p> <p>This case is reported on former argument, 143 N. Y. 271; on re-argument, 144 id. 642.</p>
Relies on Lough v. . Outerbridge
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1894-10-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 1942
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →