145 Ohio App. 3d 231 - State v. Philpot’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Ross · Sedillo v. United States · State v. Fanning
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Davis did only what was minimally necessary to raise this issue below. Davis merely asserted his 'position' that the offenses were allied offenses of similar import but did not make any arguments as to why the offenses were allied and ultimately deferred to the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitaker“for a resentencing hearing solely for the purpose of determining whether [Philpot] committed the [three offenses] separately or with a separate animus.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Whitaker“'the defendant may not be convicted of both unless the court finds that the defendant committed the crimes separately or with separate animus.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.