145 Ohio App. 3d 277 - State v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
67 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably 149 Ohio App. 3d 541 - State v. Ruby (2002), State v. Collier (2009)
67 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories · Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams · State v. Edmonson · 139 Ohio App. 3d 827 - State v. Boshko · 78 Ohio App. 3d 784 - State v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]efore imposing a financial sanction under section 2929.18 of the Revised Code[,] * * * the court shall consider the offender's present and future ability to pay the amount of the sanction or fine.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“'This is because the ability to pay a fine over a period of time is not equivalent to the ability to pay legal counsel a retainer fee at the onset of criminal proceedings.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) The offender committed the multiple offenses while the offender was awaiting trial or sentencing, was under a sanction imposed pursuant to section 2929.16 , 2929.17 , or 2929.18 of the Revised Code, or was under post-release control for a prior offense. {¶ 10}”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.