Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Ohio App. 3d 408 - State v. Sutton

145 Ohio App. 3d 408 - State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jenks · State v. Adams · State v. Maurer · State v. Bridgeman · 3 Ohio App. 3d 145 - State v. Cartellone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Unlike the higher degree of culpability of `purposely,' `knowingly' does not require the specific intent to commit the crime. * * * `Under the common law, crimes *Page 21 committed with”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “were classified as crimes of general intent, and culpability could be inferred from the voluntary performance of the act itself * * *,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.