145 Ohio App. 3d 555 - State v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
270 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 272 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Jacinto (2020), Belmar v. State (2005)
270 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Simmons v. United States · Manson v. Brathwaite · Lockhart v. Fretwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 272 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person acts knowingly, regardless of his purpose, when he is aware that his conduct will probably cause a certain result or will probably be of a certain nature. A person has knowledge of circumstances when he is aware that such circumstances probably exist.”
43 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a] strong showing of reliability can arise from the fact that a [witness] knew the perpetrator of a crime before the crime was committed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The opinion of a witness as to whether another witness is being truthful is inadmissible.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.