Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 145 Ohio App. 3d 92 - State v. Winchester

145 Ohio App. 3d 92 - State v. Winchester’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · State v. Schiebel · State v. Cook · State v. Eppinger · 58 Ohio St. 3d 121 - Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Massengale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Clear and convincing evidence is that measure or degree of proof which will produce in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations sought to be established. It is intermediate, being more than a mere preponderance, but not to the extent of such certainty as is required beyond a reasonable doubt as in criminal cases. It does not mean clear and unequivocal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a person who has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to committing a sexually-oriented offense and is likely to engage in the future in one or more sexually-oriented offenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.