145 Or. App. 66 - State v. Bozman’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Partial responsibility [another name for ORS 161.300 ] is not an affirmative defense, and a defendant need not provide pretrial notice of that defense unless the defendant intends to introduce expert testimony on that issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Evidence that the actor suffered from a mental disease or defect is admissible whenever it is relevant to the issue of whether the actor did or did not have the intent which is an element of the crime."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.