In re M.B.’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2022
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Howard v. Arkansaw · Cox v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Department of Human Services · Clifton v. Clifton · YDF, INC. v. Schlumar, Inc. · Dancy v. Owens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is fundamental . . . and cannot be . . . waived by the parties, or overlooked by the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Court of Criminal Appeals is a court of special and limited jurisdiction, with exclusive appellate jurisdiction only in criminal matters. . . Because the order involved here arose out of a criminal case, and there is a lack of any clear statutory authority providing otherwise, we determine that the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over this appeal and transfer the cause.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This case arises out of and relates to a criminal case involving a youthful offender . . . Because this appeal arose out of a criminal case, we determine that the Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.