Wright v. Terrell’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 160 (§ 10 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Collins v. City of Harker Heights · Gomez v. Toledo · Darden v. Wainwright · Folsom v. Burger King · 115 Wash. 2d 506 - ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the statute does apply to suits against individuals for acts committed within the scope of their employment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wright v. Terrell“plurality opinion has only limited precedential value and is not binding on the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wright v. Terrell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.