Horner v. Horner’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 1966
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O'Neal v. Rupp · Duncan v. Bell, Johnston, Jack & Co. · Ross v. Espy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is nothing confusing or inconsistent in these rules; they constitute an intelligible system, under which the appellant [defendant] had an option to treat the transcript as the narr, or compel a more specific statement of claim.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sterner v. Parr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.